Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHuang, S.
dc.contributor.authorNaz, N. B.
dc.contributor.authorShrestha, N.
dc.contributor.authorMishra, V.
dc.contributor.authorDaggupati, P.
dc.contributor.authorGhimire, U.
dc.contributor.authorVetter, T.
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-24T14:38:13Z
dc.date.available2022-01-24T14:38:13Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/2839024
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to investigate the influence of hydrological model calibration/validation on discharge projections for three large river basins (the Rhine, Upper Mississippi and Upper Yellow). Three hydrological models (HMs), which have been firstly calibrated against the monthly discharge at the outlet of each basin (simple calibration), were re-calibrated against the daily discharge at the outlet and intermediate gauges under contrast climate conditions simultaneously (enhanced calibration). In addition, the models were validated in terms of hydrological indicators of interest (median, low and high flows) as well as actual evapotranspiration in the historical period. The models calibrated using both calibration methods were then driven by the same bias corrected climate projections from five global circulation models (GCMs) under four Representative Concentration Pathway scenarios (RCPs). The hydrological changes of the indicators were represented by the ensemble median, ensemble mean and ensemble weighted means of all combinations of HMs and GCMs under each RCP. The results showed moderate (5–10%) to strong influence (> 10%) of the calibration methods on the ensemble medians/means for the Mississippi, minor to moderate (up to 10%) influence for the Yellow and minor (< 5%) influence for the Rhine. In addition, the enhanced calibration/validation method reduced the shares of uncertainty related to HMs for three indicators in all basins when the strict weighting method was used. It also showed that the successful enhanced calibration had the potential to reduce the uncertainty of hydrological projections, especially when the HM uncertainty was significant after the simple calibration.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.subjectRunoff quantileen_US
dc.subjectSWATen_US
dc.subjectSWIMen_US
dc.subjectVICen_US
dc.subjectANOVA analysisen_US
dc.titleImpacts of hydrological model calibration on projected hydrological changes under climate change – a multi-model assessment in three large river basinsen_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1143-1164en_US
dc.source.volume163en_US
dc.source.journalClimatic Changeen_US
dc.identifier.doidoi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02872-6


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal